WICK FUNDED vs Alpha Capital
2026 comparison · Last verified June 2026
Alpha Capital’s flat 90% split is clean and predictable; WICK’s ladder reaches a higher 95% and adds an in-house terminal plus AI coach at a lower entry. Choose Alpha for simplicity and platform choice; choose WICK for the ceiling and the software.
Alpha Capital Group (London, 2021) keeps it simple: a flat 90% split on all accounts, 1/2/3-step and instant options, and multi-platform support (MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, TradeLocker). WICK FUNDED counters with a higher 95% ceiling, an in-house terminal and an AI coach. Side-by-side:
At a glance
| Criteria | WICK FUNDED | Alpha Capital | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest entry | $29 | $50 | WICK |
| Evaluation model | 1-Step, 2-Step & Instant | 1/2/3-Step, Swing, Instant | Them |
| Profit split | 80% → 95% | 90% flat | Tie |
| Platform | In-house terminal (real-time P&L, hotkeys) | MT5 / cTrader / DXtrade / TradeLocker | Tie |
| AI coach / journal | Built-in | No | WICK |
| News trading | Allowed (±2 min restriction) | Restricted (±2 min) | Tie |
| Trustpilot | Building | 4.7 (20,000+) | Them |
| First-party account REST API | Yes — public, documented (OpenAPI 3.1) | Platform API only — no first-party account API | WICK |
| One-click MCP / AI connection | Yes — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor via OAuth | No native one-click MCP | WICK |
Choose WICK FUNDED if…
- You want a higher long-term split ceiling (95%) plus an in-house terminal and AI coach.
- You want the cheapest entry and a transparent simulated model.
Choose Alpha Capital if…
- You like the simplicity of a flat 90% split from day one and a 3-step option.
- You specifically want MT5/cTrader/DXtrade/TradeLocker platform choice.
FAQ
Is WICK’s split better than Alpha Capital’s 90%?
It depends on horizon. Alpha pays a flat 90% immediately; WICK starts at 80% and climbs to 95% over consistent profitable months. Long-term, WICK’s ceiling is higher; early on, Alpha’s flat 90% is higher.